
The objective was to identify predictive factors for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure and to describe its use in bronchiolitis.Prospective observational study that included patients diagnosed with bronchiolitis with a modified Wood's Clinical Asthma Score 5, or oxygen saturation <92%, or venous CO(2) partial pressure (PCO(2)) 60 mm Hg, with no response to medical treatment, who received NIV from December 2005 to May 2008. We collected clinical data before NIV began and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Need for intubation was considered as NIV failure.NIV was successful in 83% of 47 cases included. Patients in whom NIV failed had lower weight (5.2+/-2.2 vs. 3.5+/-0.8 kg, P=.011), lower age [1.8 (0.3-12.3) vs. 0.8 (0.4-4.3) months, P=.038)], lower heart rate (HR) before NIV began (176.3+/-19.1 vs. 160.4+/-9.7 beats/minute, P=.010), lower HR decrease at hours 1 (-16.0+/-17.3 vs.+1.1+/-11.6, P=.005) and 12 (-31.5+/-19.7 vs. -0.75+/-12.2, P=.002), presence of apnoeas (23.1% vs. 75%; P=.004) and of a predisposing condition (84.6% vs. 50%; P=.029). Multivariate analysis identified the absence of a predisposing condition, and a greater HR decrease during the first hour as success-associated independent factors (OR 0.004; 95% CI 0.000-0.664 and OR 0.896; 95% CI: 0.809-0.993, respectively).NIV has a high success rate in bronchiolitis. The main parameters which can predict NIV success are the absence of a predisposing condition and a higher HR decrease in the first hour.
Male, Treatment Outcome, Acute Disease, Bronchiolitis, Humans, Infant, Female, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial
Male, Treatment Outcome, Acute Disease, Bronchiolitis, Humans, Infant, Female, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
