
To evaluate the effect of smear layer on apical microleakage in extracted root-filled teeth by SEM and glucose penetration model.51 straight single-rooted human teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups, instrumented and irrigated differently by groups. 11 teeth in group A were irrigated with 17% EDTA and 1% NaClO,11 teeth in group B with 1% tetracycline hydrochloride and 1% NaClO,11 teeth in group C with 10% citric acid and 1% NaClO, 9 teeth in group D with 1% NaClO only and 9 teeth in group E with 0.9% NaCl. One tooth in each group was observed under scanning electron microscopy. The other teeth were obturated using lateral condensation technique. Leakage along the root filling was measured by the concentration of glucose in apical reservoir at 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 30 days respectively with glucose oxidase method. The data were analyzed with repeated measure ANOVA and SNK-q test using SPSS 16.0 software package.No smear layer on the root canal wall was observed in group A, B and C, the leakage was lower than that in group D and E (P<0.05). The smear layer occurred in quantity in group D, E and their leakage increased. The microleakage was higher in group E than that in group D (P<0.05).Removal of smear layer on the root canal wall could reduce the root apical microleakage.
Dental Leakage, Root Canal Filling Materials, Random Allocation, Root Canal Obturation, Smear Layer, Humans, Root Canal Therapy
Dental Leakage, Root Canal Filling Materials, Random Allocation, Root Canal Obturation, Smear Layer, Humans, Root Canal Therapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
