A comparison of data captured at point of care versus data captured retrospectively.
Copyright policy )A comparison of data captured at point of care versus data captured retrospectively.
Electronic data systems are being implemented in resource-poor HIV clinics to track and improve patient care. The great majority of these systems rely on paper forms and retrospective data entry, while a few have chosen to deploy point-of-care systems to collect data in real time. This study describes a comparison of data quality between these two approaches.
- University of Pittsburgh United States
Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Artificial Intelligence, Point-of-Care Systems, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, HIV Infections, Pennsylvania, Medical History Taking, Algorithms, Natural Language Processing
Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Artificial Intelligence, Point-of-Care Systems, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, HIV Infections, Pennsylvania, Medical History Taking, Algorithms, Natural Language Processing
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!