Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Reconstruction of proctocolectomy: which is the best surgical procedure?].

Authors: Akira, Sugita; Kazutaka, Koganei; Hideaki, Kimura; Kyoko, Yamada; Ryo, Futatuki; Fumihiko, Kitoh; Tsuneo, Fukushima;

[Reconstruction of proctocolectomy: which is the best surgical procedure?].

Abstract

Total proctocolectomy is commonly performed in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatosis coli. The standard surgical procedure for reconstruction is the ileal pouch anal anastomosis with rectal mucosal stripping (IPAA), which is radical treatment for the disease, or stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis with preserved anal canal (stapled IPAA), which results in a lower incidence of soiling with a high possibility of one-stage surgery. Postoperative cancer surveillance colonoscopy is recommended in patients with stapled IPAA, and patients with IPAA have also at risk for cancer in the anastomotic site, although at very low incidence. Quality of life (QOL) studies (SF36, etc.) found good QOL after surgery in patients who underwent both procedures. Patients with permanent ileostomy for preoperative anal dysfunction also had good QOL. The surgical procedure for reconstruction should be determined based on surgical indications, preoperative anal function, and patient's request. For improved QOL in the future, pouch surgery should have a lower incidence of diverting ileostomy and result in fewer bowel movements and a lower incidence of soiling, with optimal management of pouchitis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Proctocolectomy, Restorative, Quality of Life, Colonic Pouches, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!