
handle: 1887/4107869
Legal argumentation theorists have not predominantly so far been engaged in interdisciplinary argumentation. Instead, they have rather remained safely within their own discipline. However, when there is a need to justify a decision involving two or more disciplines, and in a contemporary world this is all the more so, a broader perspective is unavoidable. One example of such can be interdisciplinary argumentation joining law and economics.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
