
handle: 1887/4106760
Hoe toekomstbestendig zijn de geesteswetenschappen in het licht van de voortgaande digitalisering? In vergelijking met andere wetenschapsdomeinen, loopt kennis van het digitale in de humaniora in zowel onderwijs als onderzoek flink achter. Substantiële investeringen in geavanceerde digitale vaardigheden en computationele competenties onder docenten en studenten zijn cruciaal om ervoor te zorgen dat de geesteswetenschappen controle behouden over hun eigen toekomst. Het digitale moet geesteswetenschappers een tweede natuur worden. Hoe leuk het zelfstandig klooien met computers en code kan zijn, toont Joris van Eijnatten aan in de beschrijving van een methode om boektitels te extraheren uit een gedigitaliseerde krant.How future-proof are the humanities in light of ongoing digitalization? Compared to other scientific fields, knowledge of the digital in the humanities lags significantly behind in both teaching and research. Substantial investments in advanced digital skills and computational competencies among both lecturers and students are crucial to ensure that the humanities maintain control over their own future. The digital must become second nature to humanities scholars. Joris van Eijnatten illustrates how enjoyable independent tinkering with computers and code can be in his description of a method to extract book titles from a digitized newspaper.
computation, Boekwetenschap, Datagebruik, Geesteswetenschappen, Digitalisering, digital history, intellectual history, history of books, Digitale geschiedenis, humanities
computation, Boekwetenschap, Datagebruik, Geesteswetenschappen, Digitalisering, digital history, intellectual history, history of books, Digitale geschiedenis, humanities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
