Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparative evaluation of 2 schedules of administration of anti- neoplastic drugs by the CMF protocol in disseminated breast cancer].

Authors: D B, Korman; V A, Snimshchikov; L B, Dobroskok; I A, Maslova; S G, Mikaélian; E V, Pines;

[Comparative evaluation of 2 schedules of administration of anti- neoplastic drugs by the CMF protocol in disseminated breast cancer].

Abstract

Combined chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) in two regimens of administration was comparatively assessed in a randomized and prospective trial. Group I patients (n = 34) received methotrexate and fluorouracil once a week and cyclophosphamide every other day for 15 days. In group II (n = 32) all the drugs were given simultaneously once weekly for 15 days. A complete and partial response occurred significantly more frequently in patients of group I (36%) versus group II (7%). The intergroup difference in toxicity appeared insignificant.

Keywords

Methotrexate, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Liver Neoplasms, Remission Induction, Humans, Bone Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Fluorouracil, Prospective Studies, Cisplatin, Drug Administration Schedule

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!