Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw].

Authors: Maria-Theresa, Krauth; Alexander, Fügl; Reinhard, Gruber;

[Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw].

Abstract

Intravenous application of bisphosphonates (BP) represents an established therapeutic strategy of tumor-associated bone metastasis and severe hypercalcemia. Patients can develop osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) as a side effect of this therapy. The diagnosis of ONJ is based on three criteria: a) patients have been or are currently treated with BP; b) a deficiency in wound healing, which is in 70-80% associated with necrotic alveolar bone, characteristically exposed, is present for at least 8 weeks and c) no radiotherapy of the head and neck was performed. The suppression of bone turnover, concomitant with high functional load of the alveolar bone, and the subsequent accumulation of microfractures are considered the main pathologic factors of this disease. The cumulative incidence of ONJ lies approximately between 1 and 10% in oncologic patients, being associated with the antiresorptive potency and the respective molecular structure of the BPs. Patients with multiple myeloma develop ONJ more frequently than patients with other oncological diseases such as metastasizing breast- and prostate cancer, a fact that may also be due to the higher transfusion/injection frequency of BP in these patients. Dental treatment strategies are responsible for the occurrence of ONJ in approximately 80% of cases. Based on a clinical staging, patients can be grouped into three categories and should receive the corresponding treatment regime. Prospective clinical studies are required for a better understanding of etiology and pathogenesis of ONJ to make treatment, risk estimation and prognosis of ONJ more accurate.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diphosphonates, Injections, Intravenous, Osteonecrosis, Humans, Jaw Diseases

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!