Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Confusion about MRC dyspnea scales in Japan--which MRC dyspnea scale should we employ?].

Authors: Kenji, Miyamoto;

[Confusion about MRC dyspnea scales in Japan--which MRC dyspnea scale should we employ?].

Abstract

Though the Hugh-Jones dyspnea scale has been widely used in Japan, the British Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea scale and/or modified MRC dyspnea scales have been used in many other countries. One of these modified MRC dyspnea scales was translated into Japanese and appeared in both the "Japanese Manual of Respiratory Rehabilitation (2003)" and the "Japanese Standards for the Diagnosis and Care of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2004)" which were published by the Japanese Respiratory Society. Subsequently, the MRC dyspnea scale appeared in a textbook and in review articles published in Japan. However, this dyspnea scale, which was translated into Japanese, is not used by the British Thoracic Society, American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Canadian Respiratory Society, or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). The Japanese version of the MRC dyspnea scale has two serious problems: 1) normal healthy subjects have to be classified into dyspnea grade 0 or grade 1, and 2) incorrect Japanese translation of the scale. The Japanese Respiratory Society has to decide which MRC dyspnea scale should be employed, with a well-thought-out translation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dyspnea, Japan, Humans, Glucans, Societies, Medical

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!