
Embryo quality is routinely evaluated based on morphological and kinematic criteria, but it should also be founded on clinical and biological data from the ovulation induction treatments and the data from the SPZ test, with, if necessary, their genetic analysis. Zygote quality evaluation is based on the zygote score or the P0 profiles. Embryo cleavage kinetics is evaluated at D1 (early cleavage 25-27 h post-insemination), at D2 (four cells), and at D3 (eight cells), and their selection, particularly for eSET, is for the most part based on the cell number and regularity, the percentage of fragmentation (< or = 20 %) and the location of the fragments and the absence of blastomere polynucleation. Imaging software (Fertimorph) now facilitates the evaluation of embryo quality.
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Zygote, Cleavage Stage, Ovum, Oocytes, Embryonic Development, Humans, Embryo, Mammalian
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Zygote, Cleavage Stage, Ovum, Oocytes, Embryonic Development, Humans, Embryo, Mammalian
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
