Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Clinical evaluation of modifications of the SRK formula].

Authors: K, Matsuo; S, Kohama; N, Miyata;

[Clinical evaluation of modifications of the SRK formula].

Abstract

It was previously reported that the axial length and the refractive error were analyzed in selecting intraocular lens powers which were calculated by the SRK formula. Moreover, the predicted postoperative refraction was compared with the actual postoperative refraction. Two modifications of the SRK formula were derived from these relationships as follows; Modified SRK formula 1: R = 0.98 (P-I)-0.16L + 4.48, Modified SRK formula 2: R = 0.82 (P-I)-0.21L + 5.39. The modifications of the SRK formula were evaluated in 200 other eyes after posterior chamber lens implantation. As a result, the average refractive error was + 0.397 +/- 0.585D by the standard SRK formula, but it decreased by an average numbers of + 0.037 +/- 0.557D and + 0.047 +/- 0.547D respectively by modified SRK formulae 1 and 2. While the incidence of deviation within +/- 1.0D was 87.0% for the standard SRK formula, it was 94. 5% for both modified SRK formulas. The refractive errors, moreover, were less dependent on the axial length with both modified SRK formulae. The predicted postoperative refraction was more accurate by modified SRK formulae, especially between emmetropia and myopia up to 0.5 diopters.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Humans, Female, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Refractive Errors, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!