Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Psychological and social evaluation].

Authors: B, Blondel; M J, Saurel-Cubizolles; J, Chwalow;

[Psychological and social evaluation].

Abstract

The purpose of psychological and social assessment of health programs is the measurement of psychological well-being and lifestyle in targeted populations (i.e. pregnant women, mothers, children or teenagers) and interactive effects on other family members. A psychological and social evaluation should contain the following elements: social and/or cultural factors that facilitate participation in a health program, the opinion of and satisfaction with the program, the psychological and social consequences of the program. Three types of tools can be utilized to measure psychological and social indicators: standardized questionnaires, questionnaires designed specifically for the study in question, and interviews. Study protocols, data collection and analyses must be done using the same methods as those used in any other type of medical evaluation. The investigator must be particularly sensitive to the quality of the measurement tools, the size of the sample and the effects of confounding factors. Social and psychological aspects are essential in the evaluation of a health program. On the one hand, they allow for an understanding of how a health program is accepted and applied within a population. On the other hand, they enable the verification of whether or not there has been any change in the quality of life among individuals and their families.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Culture, Community Participation, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Interviews as Topic, Social Conditions, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Life Style, Program Evaluation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!