
This paper analyses to which extent the concept of sphere sovereignty, as developed by Kuyper and Dooyeweerd, is relevant for the understanding of late modern society. The central topic therefore is sphere sovereignty as view on social order. Firstly, I argue the urgency of studying the social-theoretical relevance of sphere sovereignty, because it has become uncertain whether the concept of social order presented in the idea of sphere sovereignty is still relevant or adequate. Secondly, I make a start with sketching the relevance of sphere sovereignty in relation to the current discourse of social order, with special attention to implications for governance theory. Here I argue that sphere sovereignty indeed can be reconnected with the theoretical discourse of late modern social order, and that the idea of normative social structures and plurality have something important to add to social theory and to governance theory. Eventually, this paper seeks a comeback of the tradition of sphere sovereignty in the social sciences at de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
