
pmid: 18693832
pmc: PMC2655898
Semantic classification is important for biomedical terminologies and the many applications that depend on them. Previously we developed two classifiers for 8 broad clinically relevant classes to reclassify and validate UMLS concepts. We found them to be complementary, and then combined them using a manual approach. In this paper, we extended the classifiers by adding an "other" class to categorize concepts not belonging to any of the 8 classes. In addition, we focused on automating the method for combining the two classifiers by training a meta-classifier that performs dynamic combination to exploit the strength of each classifier. The automated method performed as well as manual combination, achieving classification accuracy of about 0.81.
Biomedical Research, Terminology as Topic, Unified Medical Language System, Medical Informatics, Semantics
Biomedical Research, Terminology as Topic, Unified Medical Language System, Medical Informatics, Semantics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
