Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Neuromuscular monitoring].

Authors: Keiichi, Nitahara; Yasuyuki, Sugi; Kazuo, Higa;

[Neuromuscular monitoring].

Abstract

In patients receiving a neuromuscular blocking agent, quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular function is essential. For this purpose, neuromuscular monitoring devices which provide train-of-four ratio values are necessary In the absence of a quantitative monitoring device, neuromuscular function may be evaluated with the use of a nerve stimulator. Muscle responses can be monitored either using the mechanomyography, electromyography, acceleromyography, or phonomyography. Although, mechanomyography is still considred the gold standard for assessing the neuromuscular function, mechanomyography is not easy to set up and use in a routine clinical setting. At present we have only two commercially available devices which are easy to set up and useful in daily clinical practice. One is M-NMT monitor which comes with Datex AS/3 or S/5 monitor. The other is TOF-Watch acceleromyographic monitor. In clinical anesthesia, sites of monitoring can be any superficially located peripheral nerves and innervated muscles. Since different muscle groups have different sensitivity to neuromuscular blocking agents, results obtained for one muscle cannot be extrapolated to other muscles. Also, results from one monitoring method cannot be extrapolated to other methods. Anesthesiologists should be aware of these differences. In this article, the basics of neuromuscular monitoring are summarized.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Monitoring, Intraoperative, Myography, Humans, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Muscle, Skeletal, Electric Stimulation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!