
Caesarean Section is one of the most common of all surgical procedures. Common indications for caesarean section may include foetal distress, Cephalopelvic disproportion and failure of labour to progress. Both regional and general anesthesia may be employed for caesarean section. Each is relatively safe and they have their own advantages and disadvantages. Actual decision to adopt one technique over another depends on maternal and foetal status and skill and ability of the anesthesiologist to tackle the situation with the aim of patient and baby safely. Among these, many of the cases come to the hospital as emergency basis. The Anesthesiologists have to face the challenge in providing anesthesia for emergency caesarean section, being the last member in the perinatal team. The challenge faces the risks in involvement of maternal changes in pregnancy, presence of foetal distress and various anesthetic complications arising in perioperative period. Still now anesthetic mishaps are considered as the sixth most frequent cause of maternal mortality. The use of regional Anesthesia reduced the number of deaths at about 80% but deaths involving general anesthesia has not decreased and the incidence is 17 times more than the regional anesthesia. Most of the deaths or complications are related to the airway management (also failed intubation). Better skill and knowledge in physiology, pharmacology and use of modern Anesthetic technique is essential to face the problems.
Obstetrics, Emergency Medical Services, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Anesthesia, General, Fetal Distress
Obstetrics, Emergency Medical Services, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Anesthesia, General, Fetal Distress
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
