Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Chronic venous disorders and chronic venous diseases: concepts and evaluation].

Authors: J, Pereira Albino;

[Chronic venous disorders and chronic venous diseases: concepts and evaluation].

Abstract

The field of chronic venous disorders suffered, in the past, from lack of precision in diagnosis and classification. These deficiencies led to conflicting reports in studies of management of specific venous problems. To solve these troubles, the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders was created in 1994, and was incorporated into the International Reporting Standard in Venous Disorders, in 1995. Actually it is generally accepted and used. In 2004 an "ad hoc" committee of the American Venous Forum working with an international liaison committee, has recommended a number of practical changes, that include a refinement of several definitions used in describing these disorders and a simpler alternative to the full (advanced) CEAP classification, the so called basic CEAP version. The author presents a revision of this document and adapts the nomenclature used to the portuguese language. He gives special attention to the fact that CEAP classification is a descriptive one which is associated to a venous severity and a quality of life scores that are instruments for longitudinal research to assess outcomes. Finally the author advises to use of these scores specially when it is necessary to evaluate the outcomes of the treatment with veno- active drugs.

Keywords

Chronic Disease, Humans, Vascular Diseases, Veins

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!