Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The history of direct pulp capping.

Authors: Till, Dammaschke;

The history of direct pulp capping.

Abstract

The first method of capping exposed pulps, using gold foils, was described by Pfaff in 1756. Thereafter, numerous agents for direct pulp capping have been recommended. Until the end of the 19th century, most materials were used empirically with the idea that the pulp tissue must be irritated by etching or cauterization to heal. Later, more attention was drawn to disinfecting agents, because it became obvious that microorganisms were the reason for pulp inflammation - but these agents were cytotoxic. Since insufficient or inappropriate diagnoses were made before treatment, even necrotic pulps were capped. The first scientific clinical study to compare different capping materials was made by Dätwyler in 1921, whereupon zinc oxide-eugenol showed the best results. One year later, Rebel performed the first animal experiments with disastrous results, so he regarded the exposed pulp as a doomed organ. In 1920 Hermann, introduced calcium hydroxide for root canal fillings. Between 1928 and 1930 he studied the reaction of vital pulp tissue to calcium hydroxide to prove that it was a biocompatible material. Since then, calcium hydroxide has been recommended by several authors for direct pulp capping, but it took until the middle of 20th century until it was regarded as the standard of care.

Keywords

Calcium Hydroxide, Europe, Humans, Biocompatible Materials, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, History, 18th Century, Dental Pulp Capping, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!