
We evaluated the effects of the radial artery on the functional outcomes and endothelium when the harvest was made either by harmonic scalpel or by high-frequency electrocautery.Between 2002 and 2007, 982 patients with coronary artery diseases were operated for coronary artery revascularization. The radial arteries were harvested for 101 of these patients and divided into two groups depending on the use of the harmonic scalpel (Group A; N=51) and the high-frequency electrocautery (Group B; N=50). Harvesting time, use of hemostatic clips, frequency of spasm, in situ free flow, and endothelial damage were compared between the two groups.Conventional high-frequency electrocautery technique used 8.7+/-3.9 hemostatic clips versus 1.5+/-1 clips (P0.05).Ultrasonic dissection with harmonic scalpel of the radial artery is associated with a decreased use of hemostatic clips. Moreover, the harmonic scalpel has a positive effect on endothelial preservation and it was associated with increased free blood flow of the radial artery.
Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Dissection, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Forearm, Postoperative Complications, Radial Artery, Electrocoagulation, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Humans, Female, Ultrasonics, Coronary Artery Bypass, Blood Flow Velocity, Aged
Adult, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Dissection, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Forearm, Postoperative Complications, Radial Artery, Electrocoagulation, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Humans, Female, Ultrasonics, Coronary Artery Bypass, Blood Flow Velocity, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
