
Gene expression analysis has many applications in the management of cancer, including diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic care. In this context, the reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has become the "gold standard" for mRNA quantification. However, this technique involves several critical steps such as RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, quantitative PCR, and analysis, which all can be source of variation. To obtain biologically meaningful results, data normalisation is required to correct sample-to-sample variations that may be introduced during this multistage process. Normalisation can be carried out against a housekeeping gene, total RNA mass, or cell number. Careful choice of the normalization method is crucial, as any variation in the reference will introduce errors in the quantification of mRNA transcripts. By reviewing the different methods available and their related problems, the aim of this article is to provide recommendations for the set up of an appropriate normalisation strategy for RT-qPCR data in oncology.
housekeeping gene, Electrophoresis, DNA, Complementary, Models, Genetic, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Cell Count, Reference Standards, quantification, Fluorescence, normalisation, [SDV.BIO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biotechnology, [INFO.INFO-BT] Computer Science [cs]/Biotechnology, RNA, Ribosomal, Neoplasms, cancer, [SDV.BBM.GTP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology/Genomics [q-bio.GN], Humans, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Neoplasm
housekeeping gene, Electrophoresis, DNA, Complementary, Models, Genetic, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Cell Count, Reference Standards, quantification, Fluorescence, normalisation, [SDV.BIO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biotechnology, [INFO.INFO-BT] Computer Science [cs]/Biotechnology, RNA, Ribosomal, Neoplasms, cancer, [SDV.BBM.GTP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology/Genomics [q-bio.GN], Humans, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Neoplasm
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
