
Major progress in the ability to control chemotherapy-induced emesis has been made over the past 10 years. One of the several factors contributing to this improved control has been the development of accurate assessment methodology. The application of proper study methodology fostered the identification of active single agents and led to the formation of effective anti-emetic combinations. In this communication, important areas in anti-emetic study evaluation will be outlined. Proper methodology includes selection of agents or regimens that have a good rationale for study. Patient, chemotherapy, and anti-emetic factors must be controlled or standardised in good trial design, and the evaluation techniques for determining the amount of emesis or of nausea must be performed using reliable and valid methods. The statistical design employed and number of patients entered in the trial should be determined based on achievable and relevant goals.
Adult, Alcoholism, Clinical Trials as Topic, Vomiting, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Nausea
Adult, Alcoholism, Clinical Trials as Topic, Vomiting, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Nausea
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
