Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Effect of recipient mouse splenocytes taken orally by donor mouse on GVHD after splenocyte transplantation].

Authors: Bao-An, Chen; Xiao-Jing, Deng; Jia-Hua, Ding; Xue-Mei, Sun; Wei-Min, Dong; Yan-Zhi, Bi; Yan, Zhang; +10 Authors

[Effect of recipient mouse splenocytes taken orally by donor mouse on GVHD after splenocyte transplantation].

Abstract

This study was aimed to explore whether the GVHD in mice can be ameliorated and the GVL effect in mice can be reserved by transfusion of lymphocytes of donors fed with recipient splenocytes effect. Male (DBA-2) mice (H-2(d)) as donors were fed with BALB/c splenocytes, DBA-2 splenocytes, bovine serum albumin, or regular chow, every other day. Induction of tolerance was assessed by a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). Female (BALB/c) mice (H-2(d)) as recipients received total body irradiation (TBI) of 6.0 Gy ((60)Cogamma-ray) followed by inoculation of 3 x 10(3) P388 mouse leukemia cells on the same day. Subsequently, tail vein injection of 2 x 10(7) splenocytes supplied by DBA-2 was undertaken. Control groups were fed identically without leukemia cell inoculation. The results showed that GVHD was significantly ameliorated and CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio increased in recipient-mice transplanted with splenocytes of tolerated donors, compared with control animals. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different groups of recipients inoculated with leukemia cell. It is concluded that the peroral recipient-mouse splenocytes can ameliorate GVHD without hampering effect on GVL.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cell Extracts, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Cell Transplantation, Leukemia P388, Graft vs Host Disease, Graft vs Leukemia Effect, Mice, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Mice, Inbred DBA, Animals, Female, Lymphocytes, Spleen, Whole-Body Irradiation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!