Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 18223529
handle: 2445/55854 , 10550/60739 , 10550/60711
Implant fracture is an infrequent cause of implant failure. The present study evaluates 21 fractured implants, with an analysis of patient age and sex, the type, length and diameter of the implant, positioning in the dental arch, the type of prosthetic rehabilitation involved, the number of abutments and pontics, the presence or absence of distal extensions or cantilevers, and loading time to fracture. Implant fracture was more common in males than in females (15:4), and the mean patient age was 56.9 years. Most cases (n = 19) corresponded to implant-supported fixed prostheses - 16 with cantilevers of different lengths - while only two fractured implants were supporting overdentures instead of fixed prostheses. The great majority of fractured implants (80.9%) were located in the molar and premolar regions, and most fractured within 3-4 years after loading. It is important to know and apply the measures required to prevent implant fracture, and to seek the best individualized solution for each case - though complete implant removal is usually the treatment of choice.
Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implants, Male, Dental prosthesis, Restauració dental, Middle Aged, :CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO], Pròtesis dentals, Dental Restoration, UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS, Humans, Implants dentals intraossis, Female, Dental Restoration Failure, Fractures, Endosseous dental implants, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implants, Male, Dental prosthesis, Restauració dental, Middle Aged, :CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO], Pròtesis dentals, Dental Restoration, UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS, Humans, Implants dentals intraossis, Female, Dental Restoration Failure, Fractures, Endosseous dental implants, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 90 | |
| downloads | 77 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts