Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Nasal distribution of radioactive drug administered using two dosage forms.

Authors: P, Vidgren; M, Vidgren; P, Paronen; P, Vainio; J, Nuutinen;

Nasal distribution of radioactive drug administered using two dosage forms.

Abstract

The deposition patterns of 99mtechnetium labelled disodium cromoglycate particles administered either from a metered dose aerosol with a conventional nasal adaptor or from a dry powder nasal inhaler were studied using gamma camera. Disodium cromoglycate particles were firstly labelled with 99mTc using the spray drying technique. Both the metered dose aerosol and the dry powder dosage form were formulated using these radioactive drug particles. Seven healthy volunteers inhaled either three aerosol doses or one dry powder dose unit into one nostril. The drug dose reaching nasal cavity after administration from these two dosage forms was about the same. The deposition patterns as well as the changes in distribution due to the mucociliary transport were monitored by a gamma camera equipped with a low energy all purpose collimator. Initially drug doses deposited in a wider area of the nasal cavity when disodium cromoglycate particles were administered as a dry powder dosage form. In addition, retention index (%) which illustrates the movements of drug particles by mucociliary transport from the initial area of application seemed to be slightly higher for a metered dose aerosol than for a dry powder dosage form. At the end of the 30 minutes measuring period the area of the mucosal layer covered by radioactive drug particles was clearly wider for the dry powder dosage form than for the metered dose aerosol. Thus it is well possible to administer drug particles effectively into the nasal cavity as a dry powder dosage form.

Keywords

Aerosols, Male, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Technetium, Capsules, Mucociliary Clearance, Administration, Inhalation, Cromolyn Sodium, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Female, Nasal Cavity, Radionuclide Imaging, Administration, Intranasal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!