Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Romanian Archives of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Detection of Bacteroides fragilis group by immunofluorescence.

Authors: I, Radu; J, Bittner; A, Macovei; L, Costache; D, Mihalache; V, Munteanu;

Detection of Bacteroides fragilis group by immunofluorescence.

Abstract

The following strains: B. fragilis subspecies thetaiotaomicron (A); B. fragilis subspecies fragilis strain E-1, E-2, M, St., Se., Ni., 8, 16; B. fragilis subspecies distasonis 145 (D) were serologically studied by immunofluorescence as compared to agglutination. Anti-B. fragilis sera titration by immunofluorescence (IF) reaction, as compared to agglutination reaction in tube, was more sensitive (2-16 times higher titers), specific and reproducible. Among the organisms from B. fragilis group, species, subspecies and even train specificity was noticed. Also, the possibility for rapid identification of anaerobic organisms, belonging to B. fragilis group, in pathologic products obtained from experimentally infected animals (mice and rats), by IF reaction, in comparison with classic methods (anaerobic cultures and biochemical determinations) was studied. Of 87 studied animals, 61 proved positive by cultures and 59 by IF; 56 animals were shown positive and 23 animals proved negative by both methods (intermethods concordance in 79 cases). Statistical analysis of IF results provided the following: method sensitivity (detection capacity of real-positive cases)-91.80%; method specificity (detection capacity of real-negative cases)-88.46%; false-positive cases-11.53%; false-negative cases-8.19%. Immunofluorescence proved specific, sensitive, practical and rapid method detection of non-sporulated anaerobic organisms species and subspecies belonging to Bacteroides fragilis group.

Keywords

Antigens, Bacterial, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Rats, Inbred Strains, Cross Reactions, Bacteroides Infections, Antibodies, Bacterial, Sensitivity and Specificity, Rats, Bacteroides fragilis, Mice, Species Specificity, Agglutination Tests, Animals, Immunization, Rabbits

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities