Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The mechanism of action of the copper intrauterine device.

Authors: T, Tamaya; Y, Nakata; Y, Ohno; S, Nioka; N, Furuta;

The mechanism of action of the copper intrauterine device.

Abstract

The effects of copper ions on the binding of steroids to receptors revealed that the inhibitory effect of Cu++ was apparent at 10(-6)M, ANd the binding capacities decreased to 10% at 10(-2)M Cu++. The kinetic study demonstrated that Cu++ was a competitive inhibitor of steroid hormone-receptor binding (Ki divided by 2.7 X 10(-5)M to estrogen receptor; Ki divided by 5.1 X 10(-6)M to progesterone receptor). These results indicate that copper ions interfere at the steroid-binding site of receptor and that progesterone receptor is more affected by copper ions than is estrogen receptor. The sedimentation pattern showed the dissociation and aggregation of receptor macromolecules by copper. These phenomena may indicate the biologic inactivation of receptor. In fact, morphologically, progestational proliferation was severely inhibited and estrogenic action seemed to be inhibited. The Timm stain showed copper uptake by endometrial epithelium and superficial stromata. The copper content apparently increased in the cytoplasm of uteri bearing a copper intrauterine device, compared with controls. In vivo, the concentration of cytoplasmic copper was approximately 1.4 X 10(-6)M, which was obviously inhibitory to steroid hormone-receptor interaction. However, complete morphologic suppression of the progestational effect by copper cannot exclude the coexistence of some other mechanism in these phenomena.

Keywords

Uterus, Epithelial Cells, Estrogens, Receptors, Cell Surface, Binding, Competitive, Epithelium, Animals, Female, Rabbits, Copper, Progesterone, Intrauterine Devices

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!