Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Representation of clinical laboratory terminology in the Unified Medical Language System.

Authors: J J, Cimino;

Representation of clinical laboratory terminology in the Unified Medical Language System.

Abstract

The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) was examined to determine its coverage of clinical laboratory terminology in use at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center (CPMC). The Metathesaurus (Meta-1) contains exact matches for 30% of 1460 CPMC laboratory terms and near matches for an additional 42%, with better coverage of atomic-level concepts ("substance" terms) than complex ones (tests and panels). The Semantic Network includes types for representing laboratory procedures (2), measured substances (at least 56) and sampled substances (at least 14), but no type to represent specimens. Few of the UMLS semantic relationships are applicable to the CPMC vocabulary. These results have implications for the utility of the UMLS for linking clinical databases to electronic medical information sources.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Dictionaries as Topic, New York City, Unified Medical Language System, Semantics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!