
In Germany approximately 29,000 people died of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) in 2002; the risk of getting CRC is 4-6% in Germany, rising with age from the 50th year of life. About one third of all people over 50 years of age have polyps with the potential for malignant transformation in the colorectum, which is a sufficiently high prevalence rate to justify screening. In contrast to most other cancer diseases, in the case of CRC it is possible to prevent the cancer and not only to detect it at an early stage. Application of the test for occult blood in persons between their 45th and 80th years can reduce the mortality of CRC by 14%. We can assume that already regular sigmoidoscopies with consistent performance of polypectomy when needed could reduce the incidence of CRC by 50-70%. There is no doubt that coloscopy is the technique of choice for secondary prevention, as it unites the possibility of complete diagnosis and treatment with a justifiably low level of risk. The economic advantages of an avoidance strategy compared with the treatment of CRC, which is certainly expensive, have been documented. On the basis of all the data reported, in the case of CRC preventive strategies can be emphatically recommended.
Adenoma, Intestinal Polyps, Colonoscopy, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Survival Rate, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Germany, Occult Blood, Humans, Mass Screening, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonography, Computed Tomographic, Precancerous Conditions, Sigmoidoscopy
Adenoma, Intestinal Polyps, Colonoscopy, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Survival Rate, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Germany, Occult Blood, Humans, Mass Screening, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonography, Computed Tomographic, Precancerous Conditions, Sigmoidoscopy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
