Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Invasive mole: Indonesian perspective.

Authors: Djamhoer, Martaadisoebrata;

Invasive mole: Indonesian perspective.

Abstract

To share our experiences concerning the characteristics of invasive mole (IM), including transformation and progression, its propensity to perforate, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and prognosis.A cross-sectional, descriptive, analytic study, conducted at Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia.There were 27 cases of IM, histologically confirmed. Seventy and three tenths percent were preceded by complete mole, 18.5% by partial mole and 11.2% by uncertain pathology. The average patient age, gravidity, transformation period and uterine size were 34.4 years, 4.4 pregnancies, 2.6 months and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Ultrasound findings in 20 cases were: 9 (45%) diagnosed as IM, 8 (40%) as choriocarcinoma, 2 (10%) as hydatidiform mole and 1 (5%) doubtful. Perforation occurred in 18 (66.7%) cases, 61.1% to the abdominal cavity, 5.5% to the uterine cavity and parametrium, 11.1% to the abdominal and uterine cavity and 16.7% to the abdomen and parametrium. There were 3 deaths, 2 due to perforation to the parametrium and 1 to the abdomen. Two cases developed metastasis, 1 to the vagina and the other to the lungs. Both survived. The surgical intervention rate was 96.3%, with all patients having hysterectomy except for 1 exploratory laparotomy.IM should be suspected in multiparous patients with a history of mole and short transformation period. Ultrasound as a diagnostic tool is promising, but still needs further study. The incidence of perforation is high with possibility of death, yet the prognosis remains good provided that the acute period is managed appropriately. The method of follow-up is similar to mole.

Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Hydatidiform Mole, Invasive, Gravidity, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Indonesia, Pregnancy, Uterine Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!