
Of 220 patients undergoing liver transplantation between March 1982 and April 1991, eighteen (8.1 percent) already had a surgical portasystemic shunt. Four patients had a distal splenorenal shunt, six a side-to-side portacaval shunt, three an end-to-side portacaval shunt, and five, a mesocaval shunt. The splanchnic venous system was assessed by Doppler ultrasound examination and angiography before liver transplantation. Perioperative mortality rate was higher but not significantly different from that observed in the population of patients without previous portasystemic shunt (33.3 percent versus 21.7 percent). Liver transplantation was particularly difficult in the six patients with a previous side-to-side portacaval shunt, in which the perioperative mortality rate was high (66.6 percent). Liver transplantation is feasible in patients with a previous portasystemic shunt but carries a higher risk. It is easier when no previous dissection of the hepatic pedicle has been done. Suppression of the shunt after revascularization of the graft must be performed in order to provide optimal venous flow to the hepatic graft.
Adult, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Adolescent, Portal Vein, Budd-Chiari Syndrome, Middle Aged, Thrombophlebitis, Liver Transplantation, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Humans, Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical, Female, Intraoperative Complications, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Adult, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Adolescent, Portal Vein, Budd-Chiari Syndrome, Middle Aged, Thrombophlebitis, Liver Transplantation, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Humans, Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical, Female, Intraoperative Complications, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
