Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Making sperm: design, quality control and sperm competition.

Authors: Tim R, Birkhead; Simone, Immler;

Making sperm: design, quality control and sperm competition.

Abstract

Spermatozoa vary remarkably in design at several different levels: phyla, orders, families, species, individuals, within individuals and within ejaculates of the same individual. Three factors are thought to account for some of this variation: (i) fertilisation mode; (ii) phylogeny, and (iii) postcopulatory sexual selection (i.e. sperm competition and cryptic female choice). We focus here on the hypothesis that post-copulatory sexual selection shapes sperm design and how this hypothesis can be tested. We discuss the importance of controlling for fertilisation mode and phylogeny. In addition, we consider the way the intensity of postcopulatory sexual selection is measured and how this may influence the way we test this hypothesis. So far the evidence that post-copulatory sexual selection influences inter-specific differences in sperm is mixed. We also consider how post-copulatory sexual selection influences variation in sperm design between and within males. In two phyla (mammals and birds) we show that reduced selection via sperm competition results not only in reduced sperm numbers but also in unusual (immature but functional) sperm phenotypes, high inter-male variability and high levels of sperm pleiomorphy within ejaculates. We propose that these are all energy-saving adaptations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Birds, Male, Mammals, Species Specificity, Fertilization, Animals, Humans, Energy Metabolism, Spermatogenesis, Spermatozoa, Phylogeny

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!