Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Unstable Jefferson variant atlas fractures: an unrecognized cervical injury.

Authors: C, Lee; J H, Woodring;

Unstable Jefferson variant atlas fractures: an unrecognized cervical injury.

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed the plain films and CT scans of 11 unstable atlas fractures from a series of 72 atlas fractures to better characterize these injuries and to determine if the correct diagnosis could have been made. These 11 atlas fractures were unstable because either the anterior bony ring was disrupted (six cases), the posterior longitudinal ligament was torn (one case), or both the anterior bony ring and the posterior longitudinal ligament were disrupted (four cases), allowing C1-C2 subluxation to occur. Although all the fractures were potentially unstable, only eight demonstrated subluxation on the lateral radiography. Despite the abnormal open mouth view in all cases, the plain films showed minimal abnormalities, requiring CT for definitive diagnosis. Less than half (five of 11) of the patients had other levels of spine injury or associated transverse ligament tear. Three of the 11 patients were quadriplegic, and two died as a result of their spinal cord injury. These unstable atlas fractures were similar to the classical Jefferson fracture in appearance and mechanism, except that they had fewer than four breaks in the atlas ring and were associated with severe neurologic injury and lower level spine injuries. The pattern of bilateral anterior arch fractures was associated more often with neurologic injury. Because of these differences, we chose to refer to them as Jefferson variant fractures to distinguish them from the classical Jefferson fracture and to emphasize the seriousness of this injury.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Fractures, Bone, Ligaments, Articular, Humans, Cervical Atlas, Quadriplegia, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Spinal Cord Injuries, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!