Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
 View all 1 versions
Claim

Ionizing radiation exposure--more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations.

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jul 2010 Canada English Journal:The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, volume 50 (issn: 0008-3194, Copyright policy )
Authors: Bussières, André E.; Ammendolia, Carlo; Peterson, Cindy; Taylor, John A. M.;

pmid: 17549173

pmc: PMC1839988

Ionizing radiation exposure--more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations.

Abstract

The article responds to a commentary by P.A. Oakley and colleagues on "phantom risks" associated with diagnostic ionizing radiation. It examines the evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic. The article claims that Oakley and his colleagues provide a biased and unscientific evaluation of the evidence.

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

CHIROPRACTIC, 330, 610, IONIZING radiation, RADIOGRAPHY, DIAGNOSIS, RADIOTHERAPY

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now