Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Retinol and retinol-binding protein in lung cancer screening.

Authors: T E, Edes; P S, McDonald;

Retinol and retinol-binding protein in lung cancer screening.

Abstract

Human epidemiology studies demonstrate an inverse correlation between serum levels of vitamin A and the incidence of lung cancer. While such studies suggest that vitamin A may have a role in cancer prevention, the intent of this study was to investigate the use of vitamin A status parameters as markers for detection of occult lung cancer. In the first of two phases of this study, we established criteria for a prospective screening study. Serum levels of retinol-binding protein (RBP), zinc, retinol, and beta-carotene in lung cancer patients were compared to levels in controls. For the second phase, a prospective screening study, 100 ambulatory male cigarette smokers over the age of 45 were enrolled. Subjects were excluded if they had a known diagnosis of cancer, recent weight loss, or serum albumin less than 3.5 g/dl. Subjects with RBP less than 4.2 mg/dl and retinol less than 42 micrograms/dl were classified as high-risk; those remaining were classified as controls. A chest X-ray (CXR) was obtained on all 17 high-risk subjects and on 26 of the 83 controls. CXR was read and follow-up was performed by physicians without knowledge of this study. Lung cancer was detected in 24% (4/17) of the high-risk subset, and 4% (1/26) of the controls. These data suggest that retinol and RBP may be useful in lung cancer screening for selecting a high-risk population that warrants further examination.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Lung Neoplasms, Incidence, Smoking, Middle Aged, Carotenoids, Radiography, Retinol-Binding Proteins, Zinc, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Mass Screening, Prospective Studies, Vitamin A

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!