Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Long term effect of LDL apheresis in Japan. LDL Apheresis Study Group.

Authors: C, Naito; A, Yamamoto; Y, Saito; E, Muto; T, Nishide; M, Shinomiya; M, Mukai; +3 Authors

Long term effect of LDL apheresis in Japan. LDL Apheresis Study Group.

Abstract

LDL-apheresis is introduced in many cases all over Japan. Among them, evaluation of long-term effect on ischemic heart disease (IHD) has made on 10 cases with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and 49 cases with heterozygous FH. As to homozygous FH, 3 patients had angina pectoris. Mean duration of treatment was 26 months (52 treatments). The changes in total cholesterol (TC) in each treatment was from 426 mg/dl to 151 mg/dl. Improvement in IHD was observed in 5 out of 10 cases. As to heterozygous FH, 17 cases had history of myocardial infarction and 12 had angina pectoris. Mean duration of treatment was 13 months (19 treatments). Mean TC was decreased from 271 mg/dl to 126 mg/dl by each treatment. Regression in Achilles tendon thickenting or skin and palpebral xanthomas was observed. Frequency of anginal attacks decreased in 8 out of 17 cases. Ischemic change in ECG were improved in 3 out of 26 cases. Coronary angiography performed with 2 to 3 years of interval in some cases revealed regression or no progression in coronary stenosis. As a whole, IHD improved in 15 cases and exacerbated in 2 cases. Main side effect was hypotension attack. Bradycardia and anginal attack during treatment were observed in some cases. LDL-apheresis was judged as effective in 25 out of 44 patients with IHD or xanthoma.

Keywords

Heterozygote, Time Factors, Homozygote, Coronary Disease, Cholesterol, LDL, Lipids, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Cholesterol, Japan, Blood Component Removal, Xanthomatosis, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!