Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Redescription of the species of Calyptrobothrium Monticelli, 1893 (Tetraphyllidea: Phyllobothriidae) parasites of Torpedo marmorata in Torpedo nobiliana (Elasmobranchii: Torpedinidae)].

Authors: Fadila, Tazerouti; Louis, Euzet; Nadia, Kechemir-Issad;

[Redescription of the species of Calyptrobothrium Monticelli, 1893 (Tetraphyllidea: Phyllobothriidae) parasites of Torpedo marmorata in Torpedo nobiliana (Elasmobranchii: Torpedinidae)].

Abstract

A study of the cestodes from the intestinal parasites of torpedinid elasmobranchs off the coast of Algeria, revealed the presence, in Torpedo marmorata Risso, of a species of Calyptrobothrium Monticelli, 1893, which we believe is identical to C. riggii Monticelli, 1893. This species, which has not been re-examined since its original description, is redescribed. We consider that the cestode from T. marmorata, described by Zschokke (1888) under the name of Tetrabothrium longicolle Molin, 1858, is conspecific with C.riggii. In Torpedo nobiliana Bonaparte, from the Mediterranean, we found C. occidentale Linton, 1900 and C. minus Linton, 1907. These two species are redescribed based on the type-material from the North American Atlantic coast, as well as from specimens collected off Sète and Algeria. We place several specimens, previously identified as C. riggii, as conspecific with C. minus. An amended diagnosis for Calyptrobothrium is proposed. We discuss the attribution of Bilocularia hyperapolytica Obersteiner, 1914 from Centrophorus granulosus (Centrophoridae) to Calyptrobothrium. C. chalarosomum Alexander, 1963 from Cephaloscyllium isabellum (Scylliorhinidae) off New-Zealand is excluded from the genus and placed close to Crossobothrium Linton, 1889.

Keywords

Fish Diseases, Species Specificity, Animals, Cestoda, Cestode Infections, Torpedo

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!