Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Indicated vs. routine prenatal urine chemical reagent strip testing.

Authors: Mary Ann, Rhode; Howard, Shapiro; Oliver W, Jones;

Indicated vs. routine prenatal urine chemical reagent strip testing.

Abstract

To determine if urinary tract infection, high blood pressure and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are underdiagnosed when prenatal urine testing is done on a clinically indicated vs. routine basis.Prenatal and delivery records of 2,981 subjects were reviewed in a predominantly Hispanic and medically underserved population. Patients prior to August 2002 received routine urine screening. After August 2002, women were tested only if preestablished criteria were present.The number of patients diagnosed with high blood pressure and urinary tract infection was equivalent in the 2 groups. Despite unchanged screening for GDM between groups, the incidence of GDM declined from 9.3% to 4.2%.GDM, high blood pressure and urinary tract infection will not be underdiagnosed if prenatal urine testing is done on an indicated basis. It is safe to discontinue routine urine screening when a regimen of initial urine cultures, GDM screening at 24-28 weeks, indicated urine chemical reagent strip testing and routine blood pressure determination is used. Criteria for indicated urine testing should be clearly defined and consistently followed by all staff.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Colorado, Prenatal Care, Hispanic or Latino, Urinalysis, Cohort Studies, Pregnancy Complications, Diabetes, Gestational, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prenatal Diagnosis, Hypertension, Urinary Tract Infections, Humans, Mass Screening, Female, Reagent Strips, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!