Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Determination of working length in general endodontic practice].

Authors: Adrienne, Gyorfi; Ibolya, Süveges; Ivan, Iványi; Arpád, Fazekas;

[Determination of working length in general endodontic practice].

Abstract

Accurate determination of root canal length is essential for successful endodontic therapy. Two methods are generally accepted for working length measurements: radiographic length determination and by the means of electronic apex locators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the working length determination habits of Hungarian dentists using a survey form containing 15 selective closed questions for data collection. The results indicate that 70% of the dentists preferred the radiographic method. 19% of the responders employ electronic apex locator. 21% of dentists relied on fingertip tactile sense or on the patient's response. 44% of the responders determined the working length after pulp tissue removal. 22% of dentists make the measurements at the end of root canal instrumentation. 34% of the dentists disregard the evaluation of the preoperative radiographs for the estimated working length determination. The results suggest that whilst most of the general practitioners use the techniques currently taught in dental schools, a large proportion of them apply methods not accepted by contemporary dental profession.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Hungary, Dentists, Middle Aged, Root Canal Therapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Radiography, Dental, Humans, Odontometry, Female, Dental Pulp Cavity, Root Canal Preparation, Practice Patterns, Dentists'

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!