
To evaluate the efficacy of nonmydriatic digital retinal images for determining diabetic retinopathy.Single field 45-degree digital retinal images of 225 eyes from 142 diabetic patients were obtained with a nonmydriatic camera. The images were diagnosed and graded by a general ophthalmologist. These results were compared with clinical diagnosis obtained by retinal specialists, after examination by using biomicroscope with plus lens and indirect ophthalmoscope of the patients. International clinical diabetic retinopathy disease severity scale was used for grading diabetic retinopathy in all cases.Presence of diabetic retinopathy was detected in 70 eyes (31.1%). The sensitivity and specificity for determining diabetic retinopathy was 68.57% (95%CI 57.00-78.20) and 92.25% (95%CI 87.00-95.50), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 80.00% (95%CI 68.20-88.20) and 86.67% (95%CI 80.60-91.00). Overall accuracy was 84.89%.Single field 45-degree nonmydriatic digital retinal images were limited by fair sensitivity for determining diabetic retinopathy although overall accuracy from the present study was relatively high. Upcountry, this tool might facilitate increased access of diabetic patients for eye evaluation but cannot replace standard eye examination.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Diabetic Retinopathy, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Diabetic Retinopathy, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
