Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The incidence of postoperative residual curarization in the recovery room after rocuronium administration].

Authors: M, Adamus; J, Koutná; C, Neoral;

[The incidence of postoperative residual curarization in the recovery room after rocuronium administration].

Abstract

In 513 patients, we investigated residual curarization after general anaesthesia with rocuronium administered, without peroperative neuromuscular blockade monitoring. On admission to the recovery room, the ulnar nerve was stimulated submaximally (30 mA) and the evoked muscle response was quantified with accelerometry (TOF-Watch SX, Organon). The postoperative residual curarization was defined as a TOF-ratio < 0.9 and could be demonstrated in 174 patients (34 %). Compared to the group with adequate recovery, these patients received larger rocuronium dose [45.4 (SD 13.2) mg vs. 40.4 (SD 14.3) mg, p < 0.01], less experienced anaesthesiologists conducted their case [p <0.01], shorter time had elapsed since the last rocuronium dose [58.4 (20.9) min. vs. 64.9 (27.2) min., p < 0.05], their core temperature was lower [35.4 (0.6) degrees C vs. 35.8 (0.6) degrees C, p < 0.011 and on average, they received less neostigmine during anaesthesia [0.26 (0.47) mg vs. 0.57 (0.71) mg, p < 0.01]. We conclude that it is necessary to antagonize residual block after rocuronium, especially in the absence of perioperative neuromuscular monitoring.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Neuromuscular Blockade, Humans, Female, Androstanols, Anesthesia, General, Middle Aged, Rocuronium, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!