Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis patients infected by M. africanum versus M. tuberculosis.

Authors: B C, de Jong; P C, Hill; A, Aiken; D J, Jeffries; A, Onipede; P M, Small; R A, Adegbola; +1 Authors

Clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis patients infected by M. africanum versus M. tuberculosis.

Abstract

A tuberculosis (TB) case contact study in the Gambia.To test whether Mycobacterium africanum, which has lost around 68 kb compared with M. tuberculosis sensu stricto, causes less severe TB disease.We genotyped mycobacterial isolates and compared clinical and radiological characteristics as well as outcome data of M. africanum-infected TB patients with those infected with M. tuberculosis.Of 317 index cases, 301 had a mycobacterial isolate available, 290 of which had an interpretable spoligotype pattern. Of these, 110 isolates (38%) were M. africanum and 180 (62%) were M. tuberculosis. M. africanum cases had lower body mass indices (17 vs. 17.45 for M. tuberculosis-infected patients, P = 0.029) and their radiographic disease was more extensive (96% vs. 89% had at least moderately severe radiographic changes, P = 0.031). Outcome on treatment was similar (2.8% of human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] negative M. africanum patients died on treatment vs. 3.0% of M. tuberculosis patients, P = 0.95).M. africanum causes sputum smear-positive tuberculosis disease that is at least as severe as that caused by M. tuberculosis sensu stricto. Further clinical comparisons may be helpful in smear-negative patients and HIV-TB co-infected patients, and to identify whether there is any difference in time to develop disease.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Genotype, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Middle Aged, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Radiography, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Tuberculosis, Female, Gambia, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!