Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Mu rhythm: clinical assessment of the atypical type].

Authors: Y, Urakami; S, Okada; T, Kato; M, Tsuji; R, Inoue;

[Mu rhythm: clinical assessment of the atypical type].

Abstract

Of 5,218 patients who received EEG examination at our laboratory during a 9-month period in 1989, 241 showed the 7-13 Hz arch-shaped activity originating from over the Rolandic area known as mu rhythm. These subjects were divided into two groups as follows: Group 1, 171 subjects showing typical mu rhythm, i.e., recorded during wakefulness and not affected by visual stimulation but blocked voluntary movements or tactile stimuli; and, Group 2, 70 subjects showing atypical mu rhythm, i.e., accentuated or activated by drowsiness, photic stimuli, or hyperventilation. No difference between the two groups was found with regard to frequency, amplitude or origin of the mu rhythm. Age distribution for Group 1 showed a peak between the ages of 6 and 15 (67.5%), while that for Group 2 peaked between the ages of 11 and 15 (35.7%) considering high incidence in older age range. There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to gender. Although both groups showed a high incidence of epilepsy, Group 2 showed higher incidence of intractable epilepsy (p less than 0.05), as well as of severe intracranial trauma and of organic brain disease. On EEG recorded among epileptic patients, paroxysmal discharge was more frequent in Group 2 (p less than 0.01), although no other difference between the two groups was observed. Atypical mu rhythm may indicate more severe epilepsy, and careful observation of patients with atypical mu rhythm is recommended.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Epilepsy, Adolescent, Respiration, Electroencephalography, Prognosis, Humans, Female, Child, Sleep, Photic Stimulation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!