Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Evaluation of the efficacy of temephos in the campaign against dracunculosis].

Authors: J P, Chippaux; I, Laniyan; M, Akogbeto;

[Evaluation of the efficacy of temephos in the campaign against dracunculosis].

Abstract

Efficacy of water source treatment with temephos 200 EC had been tested with three methods after treatment of a natural reservoir in a temporary river bed. 1. Residual pesticide in water treatment was measured with a biological test based on the pesticide toxicity on mosquito larvae from a laboratory stock for which the standard LD50 for the considered pesticide is stable and accurately known. After pesticide treatment, samples of the treated source water were taken. 30 larvae were placed in 200 ml of the treated water either pure or diluted in untreated water (ten dilutions tested). The mortality rate of larvae after 24 hours was observed and marked on a probit scale. The LD50 was read directly from the curve. The corresponding dilution of the water sample that contained one standard LD50 was expressed in mg.l-1, using the value of the standard LD50. This method was found reproducible and sensitive (up to 0.001 p.p.m.), depending on the value of the standard LD50. 2. Lethality of cyclopides was measured by numeration of survivals in 10 liters samples and compared to the natural population of a close untreated water reservoir in the higher part of the same river. Results showed that half-life of temephos was shorter than 3 days and the concentration corresponding to the LD50 for cyclopides was reached a week after treatment. Two or three weeks after treatment the cyclopide population was significant and further pesticide application was needed. 3. Decrease of incidence of dracunculiasis was compiled by weekly examination of the population during the season of transmission. Authors observed an incidence of 37% during the 86/87 season.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Aedes, Water Supply, Dracunculiasis, Animals, Benin, Humans, Temefos, Insect Vectors

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!