Insightlessness and an unscientific forensic expert.
Copyright policy )Insightlessness and an unscientific forensic expert.
In Council for Regulation of Healthcare Professionals v General Medical Council [2005] EWHC 579 (Admin) Collins J heard an appeal relating to sanctions imposed on a medical practitioner who had provided medically unjustifiable opinions in relation to the person responsible for the death of a child in a notorious case for which a solicitor had been convicted of murdering her two sons. The author analyses and evaluates the considerations determined by Collins J to have justified the imposition of conditions rather than erasure of the practitioner from the Medical Register.
Asphyxia, Forensic Sciences, Humans, Female, Liability, Legal, Television, Child Abuse, Child, Homicide, Professional Misconduct, Expert Testimony, Pediatrics, United Kingdom
Asphyxia, Forensic Sciences, Humans, Female, Liability, Legal, Television, Child Abuse, Child, Homicide, Professional Misconduct, Expert Testimony, Pediatrics, United Kingdom
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!