Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Effects of sediments on submerged macrophytes growth].

Authors: Kaining, Chen; Xiaofeng, Chen; Weimin, Chen; Ensheng, Liu; Cejie, Lan; Hai, Xu;

[Effects of sediments on submerged macrophytes growth].

Abstract

With mesocom experiment, this paper studied the effects of different sediments (sandstone, clay and mud) in Taihu Lake of China on the growth of four submerged macrophytes Vallisneria natans, Potamogeton malaianus, Hydrilla verticillata, and Ceratophyllum demersum. The results showed that among the test sediments, mud was more available. When growing on sandstone, clay and mud, the mean biomass of V. natans, P. malaianus, H. verticillata and C. demersum was 72.37, 126.25 and 134.10 g, 40.0, 72.10 and 90.70 g, 0.27, 6.58 and 73.64 g, and 0.17, 3.26 and 84.42 g, respectively. V. natans and P. malaianus had a stronger adaptability to the clay with lower nutrients contents, while H. verticillata and C. demersum didn't. All the test species grown on sandstone had the lowest biomass and shoot height, and H. verticillat and C. demersum were not able to survive by the end of the experiment. V. natans had a lower root activity (TTC) than P. malaianus, being 0, 0.16 +/- 0.05 and 0.36 +/- 0.33 mg x g(-1) x h(-1), and 2.68 +/- 0.34, 2.30 +/- 0.77 and 5.24 +/- 0.67 mg x g(-1) x h(-1) when growing on sandstone, clay, and mud, respectively. The oxygen release from the root systems of test submerged macrophytes was in the order of V. natans > P. malaianus > H. verticillata. The measurements of chlorophyll content, cell membrane permeability, and MDA also had the similar trends mentioned above.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Geologic Sediments, Plant Development, Fresh Water, Biomass, Plants

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!