Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio Istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

[Fetal and maternal amniocentesis complications].

Authors: Borrelli AL; COBELLIS, Luigi; Di Domenico A; Felicetti M; Laboccetta A; Ferrara C; Raffio R; +1 Authors

[Fetal and maternal amniocentesis complications].

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of complications due to the prenatal invasive diagnosis performed by amniocentesis at the Department of Prenatal Diagnosis of the Second University of Naples.A total of 1.580 patients who underwent amniocentesis from January 2001 to December 2003, were submitted to a telephone interview concerning the complications that occurred after the invasive diagnosis.Only 1.416 patients out of the total patients interviewed answered correctly to the questionnaire. The complications that occurred in the first 24 h from amniocentesis (early complications) included light contractions and lipothymia respectively in 8.3% and 6.7% of cases; losses of amniotic fluid took place in 1.06% while bleedings were observed in 0.85% of cases. The incidence of abortions occurred in the week following amniocentesis was 0.78%. Preterm labor occurred in only 6% of the patients submitted to amniocentesis, spontaneous labor at term in 43% and cesarean section in 51%. The Apgar index at birth was normal in 95.7% of cases. In the remaining 4.3% pathologies like hypoglycemia or respiratory distress, which promptly regressed, were observed. Early complications and the incidence of abortions were significantly and independently associated with the double needle puncture but not with maternal age or the placenta specimen obtained during amniocentesis.A careful observation of the technique and the protocol, as well as a careful selection of patients are necessary presuppositions in order to further decrease the occurrence of complications due to amniocentesis.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Adult, Pregnancy Complications, Fetal Diseases, amniocentesi; Diagnosi Prenatale; complicanze, Pregnancy, Incidence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Amniocentesis, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!