Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Different expression of CD36 antigen molecule on the surface of megakaryocyte lineage leukemias and megakaryocyte leukemia cell lines MEG-01 and HEL.

Authors: N, Imamura; D M, Mtasiwa; T, Inada; A, Kuramoto;

Different expression of CD36 antigen molecule on the surface of megakaryocyte lineage leukemias and megakaryocyte leukemia cell lines MEG-01 and HEL.

Abstract

Peripheral blood leukemic cells from four patients with peroxidase negative acute leukemia, which expressed neither myeloid nor lymphoid cell surface antigens, were analyzed by using monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) capable of recognizing megakaryocyte-platelet-related antigens. Leukemic cells from one case reacted with 5F1 MoAb, whereas cells from all the tested cases reacted with OKM5 MoAb, which belongs to the same CD group as 5F1 (CD36). Also, culture cells from megakaryoblastic leukemia cell line, MEG-01, and human erythroleukemia cell line, HEL, showed a different pattern of expression for the CD36 antigen molecule detected by 5F1 and OKM5 MoAb, individually. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that the epitopes recognized by 5F1 and OKM5 MoAb appear on the same CD36 molecule on the surface of HEL cells by means of the two-color analysis using FACS-IV. On the basis of our experiments, we conclude that, CD36 molecule, a receptor for TSP, is synthesized and expressed in at least two ways, inside the cells and on the surface of megakaryocyte lineage leukemias and megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines MEG-01 and HEL. This is strongly suggestive that thrombospondin (TSP)-mediated adhesion represents an alternative pathway for cytoadherence, and that CD36 expression on various kinds of cells may lack some essential modifications or components necessary for the TSP receptor activity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

CD36 Antigens, Epitopes, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute, Antigens, Surface, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Antigens, Differentiation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!