Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Assessment of the "golden proportion" in agreeable smiles.

Authors: Marcos Vinícius Moreita, de Castro; Nádia Carolina de Menesses, Santos; Lucilene Hernandes, Ricardo;

Assessment of the "golden proportion" in agreeable smiles.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the "golden proportion" in individuals presenting agreeable smiles.Two hundred sixty university students aged 18 to 30 years of age (130 subjects of each gender) with maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars presenting anatomic integrity were evaluated. Agreeable smiles were considered to be those displaying at least second premolars; revealing no gingival recession in the smile area; having interdental papillae that filled all interdental spaces and were not hyperplastic; showing less than 3 mm of the maxillary gingiva; displaying the line of the lower lip parallel to the incisal line of the maxillary teeth and also to an imaginary line linking the contact points of these teeth; and, finally, presenting symmetry upon examination. Twenty-one individuals of this sample who presented this kind of smile (11 female and 10 male subjects) had their maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars of the same hemiarch measured in the cervicoincisal and mesiodistal directions using a periodontal probe, a digital Boley gauge, and digitalized analysis. Data were submitted to statistical analysis for comparison of adjacent teeth considering 1.618 (golden proportion) as a reference, with a statistical significance of P < .05.Of the agreeable smiles evaluated, 7.1% exhibited the golden proportion.The golden proportion was not often found in adjacent teeth shown in smiles in the sample studied.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Gingiva, Pilot Projects, Smiling, Lip, Statistics, Nonparametric, Humans, Odontometry, Female, Tooth

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!