Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Endovascular repair for thoracic aortic arch aneurysms.

Authors: R. CARONNO; PIFFARETTI, GABRIELE; TOZZI, MATTEO; C. LOMAZZI; S. CUFFARI; SALA, ANDREA ANTONIO; CASTELLI, PATRIZIO;

Endovascular repair for thoracic aortic arch aneurysms.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to report our experience with total and subtotal endovascular stent-grafting combined with aortic arch branch surgical revascularization for thoracic aortic arch aneurysms in high-risk patients.From December 2000 to June 2005, among 38 patients treated with thoracic stent-grafts in our department, 10 patients (9 men; mean age 71+/-6 years) at high risk for open repair were candidates for endovascular repair and/or aortic arch branch extra-anatomical reconstruction due to inadequate proximal landing zones. The left subclavian artery was over-stented 6 cases for zone 2 aneurysms, and partial or total arch stent-grafting with simultaneous revascularization of the arch branches was performed in 4 cases for zones 0-1 aneurysms.Primary technical success rate was 100%. In-hospital mortality rate was 10%. Neither paraplegia, nor acute renal failure were recorded. Immediate or late surgical conversion was never required. One type 1b was successfully treated with additional stent-graft and 2 type-2 endoleaks were sealed by coil embolization. Mean follow-up was 21-months (range 3-48 months); overall, survival rate at 12, 26, and 36 months was 90%, 60%, and 30%, respectively.Endovascular repair for thoracic aortic arch aneurysms is feasible. However, our experience suggests stent-grafting is not free of risk, and long-term and larger follow-up is required.

Country
Italy
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Analysis of Variance, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Carotid Artery, Common, Angioplasty, Middle Aged, Aortic Dissection, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Postoperative Complications, Italy, Cause of Death, Humans, Female, Stents, Hospital Mortality, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!