Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of the light intensity of high intensity light units.

Authors: Kazuyoshi, Hashimoto; Norimichi, Inai; Junji, Tagami;

Evaluation of the light intensity of high intensity light units.

Abstract

To determine the intensity of PAC (plasma arc curing) light compared with conventional QTH (Quartz tungsten halogen) light using a hardness test.The spectral distribution of two light sources was analyzed with a spectroradiometer, after the light intensity was determined. AP-X composite was packed into a black mold (4 mm in diameter and 4 mm in depth) to prepare a cylindrical specimen. The irradiating conditions for the PAC unit in the current study were fixed at 6-second irradiation with 600 mW/cm2 (P600-6), 900 mW/cm2 (P900-6), 1200 mW/cm2 (P1200-6), 1500 mW/cm2 (P1500-6), 1800 mW/cm2 (P1800-6) and 40-second irradiation with 600 mW/cm2 (P600-40). The conventional irradiating condition for QTH was 600 mW/cm2 for 40 seconds (Q600-40). After storage in 37 degrees C water for 24 hours, the hardness of the resin composite was measured with a nanoindentation testing machine. Triplicate readings were made at a distance of every 0.5 mm down to 3.0 mm from the top irradiated surface. The comparison of means was statistically analyzed applying one-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test at a significant level of P< 0.05.Although the peak height of the PAC lamp was different due to the light intensity, the waveforms were parallel with one another and the wavelength of peaks was located at the same number. The hardness value at a depth of 2.0 mm and at values of P1800-6 was not significantly different from the control.

Keywords

Analysis of Variance, Halogens, Xenon, Light, Hardness, Methacrylates, Hardness Tests, Radiometry, Composite Resins, Dental Equipment, Phase Transition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!